Stuart Russell
Professor of Computer Science
Keywords: controls
Research Areas: artificial intelligence, machine learning, real-time decision-making, algorithms, probabilistic reasoning, computational biology
Website: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~russell/
Research Description:
I am interested in building systems that can act intelligently in the real world. To this end, I work (with various students, postdocs, and collaborators) on a broad spectrum of topics in AI. These can be grouped under the following headings:
Formal foundations.
Provably intelligent systems based on the mathematical framework of bounded optimality. Topics include quasioptimal control of search and composition of real-time systems.
Learning probability models.
Topics include learning static and dynamic Bayesian networks and related models and learning with prior knowledge. Applications include speech recognition, computational biology, and human driver modelling.
First-order probabilistic languages.
FOPLs are languages that combine probability theory (for handling uncertainty) with the expressive power of first-order logic. Whereas Bayesian networks assume possible worlds defined by the values of a fixed set of random variables, FOPLs assume possible worlds defined by sets of objects and relations among those objects. Our work includes BLOG, the first language capable of handling unknown objects and identity uncertainty, both of which are inherent in many real-world applications such as vision, language understanding, information extraction, database merging and cleaning, and tracking and data association.
State estimation.
State estimation (also known as filtering, tracking, belief update, and situation assessment) is the problem of figuring out what state the world is in, given a sequence of percepts. It is a core problem for all intelligent systems. We have investigated both probabilistic state estimation and nondeterministic logical state estimation; one current project looks at the game of Kriegspiel, a version of chess in which one cannot see any of the opponent’s pieces.
Hierarchical reinforcement learning.
Intelligent behavior does not appear to consist of a completely unstructured sequence of actions; instead, it seems to have hierarchical structure in that each primitive action is part of some higher-level activity, and so on up to very high-level activities such as “get a PhD” and “earn enough money to retire to Bali”. Hierarchical reinforcement learning is about methods for learning structured behaviors and using the structure of behavior to learn faster and to reuse the results of learning in new contexts.
Intelligent agent architectures.
This topic combines all of the preceding topics in order to design complete intelligent systems. We also examine general structural properties of intelligent agents, including the connection between functional decomposition of agents and additive decomposition of reward functions.
Selected Publications: